As all the engineers know, the waveform is generally analog in nature. It is then converted into digital form for processing ease. To test our digital circuits, we usually get an analog wave from an audio frequency oscillator (AFO) and feed it to ADC to get the digital output.
But today, the technology has changed paving way to a digital synthesis of analog waveforms. They calls this as direct digital synthesis chip or simply DDS. DDS consists of a single chip that generates sine wave, triangular wave, square wave and whatever a bulky AFO can do. The wonder is, it is a digital IC. Inside the circuit, the samples of these waves are first generated and passed on to the DAC to get the output as analog waves.
DDS has a lot of advantages. First is that the entire generator has shrinked down to a chip from the size of a shoe box. The frequency of the wave and the shape of the wave can be changed at very high speed - faster than what we can do with a completely analog AFO. This finds a lot of applications in cryptic communications. Also, DDS comes with a built in passband modulator. This means phase shift keying and frequency shift keying can be done with in this chip. But everything with in a few megahertz. DDS is clocked - meaning more than one DDS chip can be synchronized through a common clock. An "out of the head" application of the same is a separate modulation of I and Q. Above all these, DDS is programmable. You can program the different sequences in which you want the frequency of the sine wave to change with time.
With all these advantages, DDS also has a few cons. The demerits include the presence of phase noise, jitter and spur in the output. But these demerits are clearly out-weighed by the advantages it has.
Monday, April 17, 2006
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
As Moore fails...
Gordon Moore became more famous because of his one casual statement, that was taken as a law. That law held good until recently. Moore's law was helpful for many computing companies to predict how fast their software would run after a signficant number of years, assuming that the particular software stands in the industry for that long.
Everything went fine, until one fine day, we found the mortality of Moore's Law. Suddenly all the programmers and processor designers started looking for alternate solutions. Programmers came up with multithreading and designers, with multi-core. Multithreading can be accomplished by running different threads on different processor cores.
Most of the processor design innovations first show up in digital signal processors and that is slowly taken into the building of microprocessors. Multi-core is not an exception. The technology in this field grows at a very fast rate. When we were all thinking that multi-core was cutting edge, "Inside DSP" magazine has reported that MIPS has come with a new DSP processor with a multithreaded licensible core, called MIPS 32 34K.
This has a single core with a built-in hardware support for switching between multiple threads. MIPS makes the rationale behind this multithreaded core with a reasonable claim that most of the time the processor is waiting idle for memory or IO. By switching between threads, the MIPS processor can use the otherwise idle cycles for doing some other useful operation. MIPS has reported that a 360MHz multithreaded processor could run 50% faster than a 400MHz single threaded processor. All these come with a small increase in the size of die.
MIPS 34K actually features five different "Thread Contexts" (TCs). Each TC has it own program counter, and register files. The processor can be tuned to switched between different thread for each and every clock cycle.
MIPS does not stop with that. It is also providing two virtual processing elements (VPEs). These VPEs have features to support OS, like look-aside buffer, etc. Meaning: at a time two operating systems can be run on a same processor. Mostly one will be an OS and the other an RTOS. That is, the same processor will run both Linux and VxWorks at the same time. MIPS also gives option to the system programmers to allocate different priorities between the two OS. Like quarter of the time is used up by Linux and the rest three-quarters are allocated to VxWorks.
But using all these is in the hands of the programmer. Programmers can only take advantage of the 34K’s multithreading capability if they write their code with multithreading in mind. This will add complexity to the software development process.
When Moore's law failed, programmers thought that the programs written so far won't run any faster than it does now. But the situation changed. This made designers think different. Innovation took place and the programmers are asked to think different to adapt to the changing environment. And the programmers did. The net effect is that we have a new system in hand. Now we know why the human race survived and dominated across different hurdles until their origin.
Everything went fine, until one fine day, we found the mortality of Moore's Law. Suddenly all the programmers and processor designers started looking for alternate solutions. Programmers came up with multithreading and designers, with multi-core. Multithreading can be accomplished by running different threads on different processor cores.
Most of the processor design innovations first show up in digital signal processors and that is slowly taken into the building of microprocessors. Multi-core is not an exception. The technology in this field grows at a very fast rate. When we were all thinking that multi-core was cutting edge, "Inside DSP" magazine has reported that MIPS has come with a new DSP processor with a multithreaded licensible core, called MIPS 32 34K.
This has a single core with a built-in hardware support for switching between multiple threads. MIPS makes the rationale behind this multithreaded core with a reasonable claim that most of the time the processor is waiting idle for memory or IO. By switching between threads, the MIPS processor can use the otherwise idle cycles for doing some other useful operation. MIPS has reported that a 360MHz multithreaded processor could run 50% faster than a 400MHz single threaded processor. All these come with a small increase in the size of die.
MIPS 34K actually features five different "Thread Contexts" (TCs). Each TC has it own program counter, and register files. The processor can be tuned to switched between different thread for each and every clock cycle.
MIPS does not stop with that. It is also providing two virtual processing elements (VPEs). These VPEs have features to support OS, like look-aside buffer, etc. Meaning: at a time two operating systems can be run on a same processor. Mostly one will be an OS and the other an RTOS. That is, the same processor will run both Linux and VxWorks at the same time. MIPS also gives option to the system programmers to allocate different priorities between the two OS. Like quarter of the time is used up by Linux and the rest three-quarters are allocated to VxWorks.
But using all these is in the hands of the programmer. Programmers can only take advantage of the 34K’s multithreading capability if they write their code with multithreading in mind. This will add complexity to the software development process.
When Moore's law failed, programmers thought that the programs written so far won't run any faster than it does now. But the situation changed. This made designers think different. Innovation took place and the programmers are asked to think different to adapt to the changing environment. And the programmers did. The net effect is that we have a new system in hand. Now we know why the human race survived and dominated across different hurdles until their origin.
Sunday, March 19, 2006
Power analysis of RFID tags
Power analysis is a type of cryptanalysis, in which the physical implementation of the cryptosystem is attacked instead of exploiting on the established algorithm. Although the designer has implemented a strong encryption algorithm, the computers and the processors in which it is implemented and the microchips leak information about the operation, processed. In power analysis, the power consumption measurements and knowledge about the baseband modulation scheme can be used to find the secrets.
Yossi Oren and Adi Shamir (the same Shamir of RSA) have shown how such an attack can be launched on RFID.
UHF C1G1 RFIDs are generally passive. These high-frequency gadgets get alive when they come to a 3 meter distance from the RFID reader. The reader generates a powerful em-waves and all the tags lying around use this and act like a standing wave generator to empower themselves. They use pulse amplitude modulation in baseband. They have a 128 bits internal tag memory. The usual communication is through 96 bits payload and 8 bit kill password bits. A handheld device can be used to send a properly formatted data for kill password. If all the bits in MSB match, the RFID tag self-destructs without intentionally sending any message to the reader.
This is actually a serious issue and the manufacturers should take care to fix it at the earliest. This problem can be fixed, if a proper attention is given to it, since the power analysis based attacks are age-old and known fixes are available handy for them.
Yossi Oren and Adi Shamir (the same Shamir of RSA) have shown how such an attack can be launched on RFID.
UHF C1G1 RFIDs are generally passive. These high-frequency gadgets get alive when they come to a 3 meter distance from the RFID reader. The reader generates a powerful em-waves and all the tags lying around use this and act like a standing wave generator to empower themselves. They use pulse amplitude modulation in baseband. They have a 128 bits internal tag memory. The usual communication is through 96 bits payload and 8 bit kill password bits. A handheld device can be used to send a properly formatted data for kill password. If all the bits in MSB match, the RFID tag self-destructs without intentionally sending any message to the reader.
This is actually a serious issue and the manufacturers should take care to fix it at the earliest. This problem can be fixed, if a proper attention is given to it, since the power analysis based attacks are age-old and known fixes are available handy for them.
Thursday, March 16, 2006
RFID viruses
Computers and communication devices shrinked down at a very fast rate to the size of RFID and MEMS. RFID is a small computer-in-chip, that can be knitted with many things that we want to track. RFID transponders are usually no power circuits (not always), they are powered by an external reading device, called RFID reader. Usually RFID reader can sense only the RFID within some 50m distance. An RFID reader deciphers the query passed by the RFID transponder, to recoganize its properties. It has many application from tracking trucks to identifying your passport.
Since RFID is a computer, it can also spread virus. RFID attacks have become as common as RFIDs. Most of these attacks are normally fake RFID. That is RFID tags, that are doctored to carefully to send properly formatted, but fake data to the reader. This can result in identification problems, and mislocation problems. The attacks also include sniffing, spoofing, and even denial of service. But so far, all the RFID attacks are classified only in this category. But all these attacks are just admonitions. RFID tags can actually be used to host some serious SQL injection attacks. So the software writers for RFID readers should make appropriate security checks in its middleware to avoid these attacks. A recent whitepaper has actually shown a proof of concept of how an SQL injection can be done using RFID.
This threat is really serious and should be taken care of. Because it is very, very difficult to find and nail the hacker, who exploited the loophole. It is not internet, that you can track her through IP-address or machine address and the attacker would still keep the connection with that device or service provider. So before RFID breaks the digital divide and spreads to everybody, all these issues have to be tackled.
Since RFID is a computer, it can also spread virus. RFID attacks have become as common as RFIDs. Most of these attacks are normally fake RFID. That is RFID tags, that are doctored to carefully to send properly formatted, but fake data to the reader. This can result in identification problems, and mislocation problems. The attacks also include sniffing, spoofing, and even denial of service. But so far, all the RFID attacks are classified only in this category. But all these attacks are just admonitions. RFID tags can actually be used to host some serious SQL injection attacks. So the software writers for RFID readers should make appropriate security checks in its middleware to avoid these attacks. A recent whitepaper has actually shown a proof of concept of how an SQL injection can be done using RFID.
This threat is really serious and should be taken care of. Because it is very, very difficult to find and nail the hacker, who exploited the loophole. It is not internet, that you can track her through IP-address or machine address and the attacker would still keep the connection with that device or service provider. So before RFID breaks the digital divide and spreads to everybody, all these issues have to be tackled.
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Globalization - A game of opportunity
A few days back, I read an article read by Swaminathan Ankleseria Aiyer in Economic Times. It talked about the impact of globalization over the society. This sparked an idea inside my mind. I may be right or wrong, the readers have to decide, and please express your opinion.
The hottest discussion today is whether globalization is a boon or a bane. This discussion runs continuouly everywhere - in b-schools, in parliments, in coffee-shops, and in all the countries where people have right of speech and expression. The biggest fire ball that is thrown on globalization is that it makes rich, richer and poor, poorer.
Is this claim true? Is it true for countries? Yes and no. There are some countries, the economies of which faced a declivity as a result of globalization. But there are also countries like India, China, Brazil which use globalization as a fulcrum for their growth.
Is this claim true for individuals? Again yes and no. For yes, no example is required. It doesn't matter whether globalization is running or great depression is running, most of the unfortunate poor become poorer. People in some African countries have reached the poorest possible condition, that they can't go any further poorer. But the answer is also no. There are a lot of first generation millionaires who came up as a result of globalization. Earlier, the Forbes' richest list usually contained Sultans, and barons who were richest, because their fathers were richer and grandfathers were rich. Now, the situation is different. Bill Gates is the richest according to the recent most list. But he was not born in a rich family. So was the second ranked Warren Buffet - a newspaper boy, who ended up as the most successful investor.
What should we learn from this? All the richest people during the globalization are innovative. They are all experts in their business. They all had killer instinct and some luck during the start of their business, because the other innovators and experts did not become or did not choose to become this successful. But above all these, they all used the oppurtunity, that knocked their door. They all used globalization as an opportunity, and they all came up.
So globalization is neither a boon, nor a bane. Whoever can use it as an opportunity succeeds and whoever misses it, is carried away.
The hottest discussion today is whether globalization is a boon or a bane. This discussion runs continuouly everywhere - in b-schools, in parliments, in coffee-shops, and in all the countries where people have right of speech and expression. The biggest fire ball that is thrown on globalization is that it makes rich, richer and poor, poorer.
Is this claim true? Is it true for countries? Yes and no. There are some countries, the economies of which faced a declivity as a result of globalization. But there are also countries like India, China, Brazil which use globalization as a fulcrum for their growth.
Is this claim true for individuals? Again yes and no. For yes, no example is required. It doesn't matter whether globalization is running or great depression is running, most of the unfortunate poor become poorer. People in some African countries have reached the poorest possible condition, that they can't go any further poorer. But the answer is also no. There are a lot of first generation millionaires who came up as a result of globalization. Earlier, the Forbes' richest list usually contained Sultans, and barons who were richest, because their fathers were richer and grandfathers were rich. Now, the situation is different. Bill Gates is the richest according to the recent most list. But he was not born in a rich family. So was the second ranked Warren Buffet - a newspaper boy, who ended up as the most successful investor.
What should we learn from this? All the richest people during the globalization are innovative. They are all experts in their business. They all had killer instinct and some luck during the start of their business, because the other innovators and experts did not become or did not choose to become this successful. But above all these, they all used the oppurtunity, that knocked their door. They all used globalization as an opportunity, and they all came up.
So globalization is neither a boon, nor a bane. Whoever can use it as an opportunity succeeds and whoever misses it, is carried away.
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Socially engineered basketball game
This is one interesting news, I read today.
It was a kind of crucial NCAA basketball match-up between Univ. of California(Cal) and USC. USC is headed by their All-Pac-10 guard Gabe Pruitt. Interestingly, a few days before this match, Pruitt had a conversation over IM with a girl who claimed that she was Victoria, studying in UCLA. The chat went on so well that Pruitt decided to meet Victoria after the match-up.
Surprizingly to Pruitt, that "Victoria" had many friends in Cal, so she simply shared the entire IM conversation with them. The IM conversation was printed out and seemingly circulated among the audience of this match. The conversation contained, a "lot" of details including Pruitt's digits.
When Pruitt stood in the free throw line, he heard somebody in the crowd shouting something familiar to him - his digits. Crowd started chanting "Victoria, victoria". Pruitt apparently got embaressed. A normal 79% free-throw shooter ended up with 3/13.
This is a perfect example of how social engineering works - a very clever work. Poor USC lost the match. No idea whether the alleged "Victoria" visited the match.
It was a kind of crucial NCAA basketball match-up between Univ. of California(Cal) and USC. USC is headed by their All-Pac-10 guard Gabe Pruitt. Interestingly, a few days before this match, Pruitt had a conversation over IM with a girl who claimed that she was Victoria, studying in UCLA. The chat went on so well that Pruitt decided to meet Victoria after the match-up.
Surprizingly to Pruitt, that "Victoria" had many friends in Cal, so she simply shared the entire IM conversation with them. The IM conversation was printed out and seemingly circulated among the audience of this match. The conversation contained, a "lot" of details including Pruitt's digits.
When Pruitt stood in the free throw line, he heard somebody in the crowd shouting something familiar to him - his digits. Crowd started chanting "Victoria, victoria". Pruitt apparently got embaressed. A normal 79% free-throw shooter ended up with 3/13.
This is a perfect example of how social engineering works - a very clever work. Poor USC lost the match. No idea whether the alleged "Victoria" visited the match.
A blogspot for TCE-ECE
Yesterday, I contacted my friend Balaji after a long time. He shared a room with me 5 years back, during the first-year of my college. He was as proactive as he ever was and he suggested me something which should be given a serious thought (comment to my previous mail). The alumini of computer science department of my college have got their own blogspot, in which they share their common views. He questions why I should not start a own for my department (Electronics and Communications). A good idea. No, a very good idea.
First, I have to confess that most of my friends in my department, do not know what blog really is. But it is not a completely abstruce concept and can be thought through a single mail.
One more thing sparked into my mind, after reading that comment. We require seperate sites for CS and EC departments, because our contacts are bound inside our department. We knew people in other departments, but never involved in any intellectual conversations across departments.
Many of the final year projects that come out of our college can be classified as cutting edge (ok.. not so sharp). But so far, there has not been a single project that involved a student from, say EC and one from CS or one from Mechanical. Inside the college, there should be intellectual fusion between various departments. Students of different departments should combine together to do projects.
For instance, EC studies the FFT algorithm for digital filter design. CS studies the same as an example of divide and conquer. But rarely a few in EC knows that FFT is classified as a divide and conquer algorithm. This explains the existing situation.
So you can soon expect a blogspot for TCE-ECE. And after that there will be a fusion between various departments.
First, I have to confess that most of my friends in my department, do not know what blog really is. But it is not a completely abstruce concept and can be thought through a single mail.
One more thing sparked into my mind, after reading that comment. We require seperate sites for CS and EC departments, because our contacts are bound inside our department. We knew people in other departments, but never involved in any intellectual conversations across departments.
Many of the final year projects that come out of our college can be classified as cutting edge (ok.. not so sharp). But so far, there has not been a single project that involved a student from, say EC and one from CS or one from Mechanical. Inside the college, there should be intellectual fusion between various departments. Students of different departments should combine together to do projects.
For instance, EC studies the FFT algorithm for digital filter design. CS studies the same as an example of divide and conquer. But rarely a few in EC knows that FFT is classified as a divide and conquer algorithm. This explains the existing situation.
So you can soon expect a blogspot for TCE-ECE. And after that there will be a fusion between various departments.
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
My College grows
I did my graduation in Thiagarajar College of Engineering in the field of Electronics and Communication Engineering. I am sure half of you have not heard of such a college, until now. But these days my college is clearly going high. For computer science(CSE) and electronics department(ECE), we got a good set of juniors. So, both these departments are growing up. ECE is running franchise-record number of live projects from industries and organizations. IIT professors are visiting ECE. But the problem is, during their visits they are engaged fully by "the princy and the professors" (wow... I am not responsible for it sounding like "The Prince and the Pauper"). CSE gets open-source activists coming from outside - people like Tony Wasserman. In a few months, may be even Torvalds and Stallman. Stallman visited Tamil Nadu, an year back and Torvalds comes to Kerala once in 6 months. The problem with CSE is their lack of participation in outside events - like ACM contests, Google codejam (ok... I agree it is very difficult), Google - Summer of codes, or Redhat's Lord of the Code.
I do not know about other departments. There are a few good physicists in our college, who are "influential" in Japan. I met Jawahar a professor of Mechanical department, a few days back. He was on his way to attend an international conference. He talked about some band of professors from Italy visiting Mechanical department of my college. That visit would certainly improve its image.
My college has a lot of capacity. Huge enough to be considered one of the best in the province. My college contains students and professors who can easily take us to the helm. But the other side of the population (both students and professors) do not know what is happening around and pathetically do not even care to know. No value addition can be expected from them.
My college is a poor college. Despite its big caliber and acheivements, it does not properly project itself. The students are responsible for it because most of them have low self-confidence that they do not go out often to show what kind of stuff they have. Also some part of the students try to capitalize some provisions and discounts given by the management (it includes monetory gain, a bitter truth). The management is responsible because I have never found it trying to project itself out. Or may be I do not see things clearly. None of the conferences held in my college are sponsered by outside organizations, for instance. This agains loops down to the handling of the accounts by the students, which the management does not like for some real serious reasons.
Anyway, in long run, we will certainly succeed. Before 1950, no body thought Real Madrid would win Spanish Premiera Liga, let alone UEFA champions league. But they won the champions league in 50s and did it again and again eight times until now. Similarly, let us hope, out of all these my college will come up strong one day to be accepted as one of the best.
I do not know about other departments. There are a few good physicists in our college, who are "influential" in Japan. I met Jawahar a professor of Mechanical department, a few days back. He was on his way to attend an international conference. He talked about some band of professors from Italy visiting Mechanical department of my college. That visit would certainly improve its image.
My college has a lot of capacity. Huge enough to be considered one of the best in the province. My college contains students and professors who can easily take us to the helm. But the other side of the population (both students and professors) do not know what is happening around and pathetically do not even care to know. No value addition can be expected from them.
My college is a poor college. Despite its big caliber and acheivements, it does not properly project itself. The students are responsible for it because most of them have low self-confidence that they do not go out often to show what kind of stuff they have. Also some part of the students try to capitalize some provisions and discounts given by the management (it includes monetory gain, a bitter truth). The management is responsible because I have never found it trying to project itself out. Or may be I do not see things clearly. None of the conferences held in my college are sponsered by outside organizations, for instance. This agains loops down to the handling of the accounts by the students, which the management does not like for some real serious reasons.
Anyway, in long run, we will certainly succeed. Before 1950, no body thought Real Madrid would win Spanish Premiera Liga, let alone UEFA champions league. But they won the champions league in 50s and did it again and again eight times until now. Similarly, let us hope, out of all these my college will come up strong one day to be accepted as one of the best.
Monday, February 06, 2006
Techies - What exactly do they mean?
Most of the times we come across magazines and websites talking about geeks or techies, by default everybody assumes that it means only computer guys. For instance, an aircraft designer or a DSP engineer can never become a geek as long as he does not work in any hardcore computer software,like SAP or he is not an expert in any hardcore computer technology, like Data warehousing. Here is one more website that brings about the top paid techies of last year.
Again by techies, they simply mean computer-folks. According to this listing Data Warehousing Architects are the costliest. But who knows??? designers of engines for cars in big car companies like Toyota, Mercedes and Ferrari may have an average salary well above that of any Data Warehouse architects. Are they not techies? They are in fact hard-core techies, but not included in this statistics because for these magazines techies means only people sitting in front of computers.
Again by techies, they simply mean computer-folks. According to this listing Data Warehousing Architects are the costliest. But who knows??? designers of engines for cars in big car companies like Toyota, Mercedes and Ferrari may have an average salary well above that of any Data Warehouse architects. Are they not techies? They are in fact hard-core techies, but not included in this statistics because for these magazines techies means only people sitting in front of computers.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Hi-tech drop box
Yesterday's BBC showed that a rock-like drop box was found somewhere in Russia, which is actually a hi-tech spy drop box. It looked more like a normal rock in the video and it would probably be a wireless mesh node. It is just my guess. I had only read about some tree hole and some pigeon nest used as drop boxes and that too in Fredrick Forsyth novels.
I think, now, NSA is going to diagnose all the rocks in the United States to check whether they are rocks indeed. Who knows Russians or Al Queda might have come across the same idea to spy others. NSA will first start with the Rock of Gibralder.
I think, now, NSA is going to diagnose all the rocks in the United States to check whether they are rocks indeed. Who knows Russians or Al Queda might have come across the same idea to spy others. NSA will first start with the Rock of Gibralder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)